The Great Debate: Hospital Malpractice
vs. Medical Malpractice
Introduction
How is it possible and who is at fault
. . .
• When a patient in the Emergency Department repeatedly
explains his health problem to an endless stream of white
or rose colored coats throughout the hospital -- willingly
submits to a barrage of physical, diagnostic and laboratory
tests - only to learn weeks later that "they"
missed the correct diagnosis. Was this event caused by hospital
malpractice or medical malpractice?
• When almost 90,000 Americans (CDC, 2004) acquired
infections in a hospital last year- and died from infections
"caught" while inside what they believed to be
the least likely place to get sick?
• When 98,000 -195,000 Americans die each year in
our nation's hospitals (HealthGrades, 2004), 22 because
of medical errors? And are we sure that they all were medical
errors?
• When over 275 people have mistakenly undergone surgery
on the wrong side, limb or organ since 1999?
According to Garry M. Walsh, health care
policy and regulatory expert, the answer to both questions
is hidden in the shadow cast by a larger question that looms
overhead: "What is the difference between Health Care
and Medical Care?"
Walsh clarifies the relationships between
health care, medical care, hospital policies, medical staff
bylaws and health care regulations - as they relate to litigation
proceedings.
Discussion
These relationships are predicated upon
a basic premise: health care and medical care are not the
same. Health care is offered by a hospital to members of
its community. It is a global entity partially supported
by medical care provided by licensed physicians.
Consider the following:
• Separate regulations govern health
and medical care, with only a few guidelines encompassing
both
• Neither care can be successful without the other.
• While they are not technically the same -- they
are never independent of each other. The patient is registered
by the hospital - yet the independent physician is in charge
of the patient's diagnosis and/or treatment.
• Both health and medical care must be guided by written
policies and procedures crafted in accordance with health
care regulations.
• A hospital's nurses and associated care partners
deliver health care, accurately and safely in accordance
with the orders of a physician.
• Independent practitioners, who are not hospital
employees, order and deliver medical care.
• Rarely do physicians perform medical procedures,
deliver medical care or commit unplanned errors alone.
• Unplanned health care errors often occur without
the knowledge or involvement of a physician.
The confluence of multiple and frequently undefined chains
of command and performance expectations within these relationships
is the leading cause of hospital induced errors and allegations
of hospital malpractice. For example, the non-physician
caregiver is:
• Hired by the hospital, trained by the hospital,
paid by the hospital, and guided by hospital policies and
regulations.
• Expected to deliver care as prescribed by the independent
physician, an individual to whom they do not report to as
a matter of employment.
Ultimately, hospital malpractice can
be attributed to this transient relationship.
• As for the "who is at fault" question,
consider the circumstances resulting in the ED patient's
missed diagnosis. The facts indicate that:
• The ED physician ordered the correct diagnostic
tests, including X-rays and an EKG.
• Hospital staff performed these tests using exacting
technique and producing perfect images.
• The ED physician performed a preliminary review
of the images in the ED and informed the patient that the
diagnostic image was normal.
• In accordance with policy, the ED physician sent
the diagnostic films to the diagnostic expert, an experienced
and licensed Radiologist, for an opinion of the diagnostic
film.
• The Radiologist read the image and correctly determined
that it was not normal.
Analysis
So how was the diagnosis missed? Ambiguous,
conflicting, inconsistent hospital policy.
• Ambiguity: The policy failed to clarify whether
the ED physician was to communicate his "normal"
interpretation on the film...on a form...or in a record
before sending the image to the radiologist. This would
help the Radiologist to know the diagnosis the ED physician
told the patient.
• Conflict: One policy stated that the x-ray "department"
was to hand-carry the film and radiologist's final report
(containing the correct diagnosis) to the ED. Another policy
stated that the radiologist was to personally contact the
ED physician and inform him/her of the correct findings
on the image.
• Inconsistent: The policy provided multiple communication
procedures to be performed during M-F day shift, evenings
and weekends. A veritable potpourri of different staff members
responsible for different procedures on different work shifts,
multiple "drop boxes" in multiple departments,
etc.
Physicians performed medical duties in accordance with their
credentialed privileges, yet the patient was discharged
from the ED without knowing the correct diagnostic findings
of his exams. Neither he nor his private physician was informed,
although the physician's name was clearly indicated on the
admission face sheet.
This misdiagnosis can be attributed to
the failure of hospital policy to create seamless and timely
mechanisms ensuring communication of diagnostic findings
to the ED physician. Once advised, the patient could seek
care and treatment.
Conclusion
To avoid this type of error, hospital
and medical staff leadership must define and approve operational
guidelines that empower hospital staff to deliver patient-centric
care.
In contrast to hospital malpractice, medical malpractice
is defined as a physician's deviation from the applicable
standard of care that a similar physician would exercise
under the same circumstances.
The good news? Litigation serves as a wake-up call to both
hospitals and practitioners, prompting interest in performance
improvement measures that will improve the quality of health
care in the 21st century.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
(2004). National Vital Statistics Report. 52(13):4. Retrieved
from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss.htm
HealthGrades. (2004, July). Patient Safety
in American Hospitals. Retrieved from http://www.healthgrades.com/media/english/pdf/HG_Patient_Safety_Study_Final.pdf
Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds.
(1999). To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System.
Washington: National Academy Press.
About The
Author:
Garry Walsh has been creating, improving,
implementing and subjecting health care policies to JCAHO
scrutiny and approval since 1984. His ability to identify
and interpret regulatory or policy non-compliance and clearly
articulate the necessary changes has contributed to best
practices in healthcare - and has alerted attorneys to relevant
facts that surround and unfortunately result in patient
errors and injuries.
As a health care policy and regulatory
specialist, Walsh extends his expertise to the legal and
healthcare community. His contributions clarify quality
of care / service issues based on compliance with regulatory,
policy and bylaw requirements that guide safe and effective
hospitalizations.
Mr. Walsh can be reached at 1.800.749.7144
or 1.727.669.0800. For more information contact him at garrywalsh@hospitalpolicynet.com
or visit http://www.hospitalpolicynet.com/expert.html.
Article Source: http://www.ArticleBlast.com